上海高院对快鹿系列案二审宣判

  • 日期:07-16
  • 点击:(1946)

兴发娱乐官网登陆

7月9日,上海市高级人民法院向被告上海快鹿投资(集团)有限公司(以下简称快鹿集团)和上海长宁东宏桥小额信贷有限公司(以下简称东宏桥小额贷款公司)。上海东宏桥融资担保有限公司(以下简称东红桥担保公司)和被告人黄家璇,魏延平,周梦萌,徐琦(美国)等15人筹集资金诈骗和非法吸收公共存款。驳回上诉并维持原判。

此前,上海市第一中级人民法院对上述三名被告和15名被告作出一审判决,辩称福禄集团,东红桥小额贷款公司,东红桥担保公司和黄家屯直属15个单位的负责人。或者其他直接责任人员,以非法占有为目的,以欺诈手段非法募集资金,其行为构成了募捐诈骗罪,数额极大。徐琦还违反了国家有关规定,非法吸收公共存款,破坏了金融秩序。他的行为构成了非法吸收公共存款的罪行,数额巨大。

上述被告和被告的筹资欺诈给近4万名受害者造成了特别大的经济损失,严重影响了受害者的生命,严重破坏了国家金融秩序,严重危害国家金融安全,并结合事实案件的性质和情况。在对社会的伤害程度方面,三名被告被判处15亿元至2亿元的罚款,15名被告被判处终身监禁,刑期从9年不等,并处以罚款。

在一审判决宣告后,包括黄家璇在内的14名被告不满并上诉。上海市高级人民法院成立了一个合议庭进行审判。在第二种情况下,上诉人和辩护人充分表达了他们对上诉人是否构成筹款欺诈罪,犯罪数量,案件地位,作用,投降,立功,以及判决是否构成的意见。太沉重。

上海市高级人民法院二审的审判发现,从2014年3月至2016年4月,由参与此案的人施建祥指示的快鹿群指示东红桥小额贷款公司提供虚假索赔,以及东红桥担保公司提供虚假担保通过下属金路系统。如融资平台,虚假索赔和虚假担保被打包成各种理财产品。未经有关部门批准,公众将通过召开推广会,发送传单和网络广告,随机拨打电话,举办或赞助表演等方式进行宣传。以同样的方式宣传和销售中国海运投资系统发行的基金产品公开发布并向公众出售,以下列货币非法募集资金434亿元。

上述非法集资收益转入实际控制的银行账户,如石建祥和快劳集团。除了用于支付以前投资者本金和利息的282亿元外,其余资金用于支付各种经营费用和权益。收购,影视投资,海外转让,车辆购置,个人乱投,挪用等业务活动。案件实际经济损失152亿元。

上海市高级人民法院认为,在虚假索赔和虚假担保的自我通胀和自我保护非法集资活动中,生产经营活动所用金额明显与募集资金规模不成比例,至于“借新旧”。维持快鹿集团的运作,募集资金无法归还。库鲁集团,东红桥小额贷款公司和东宏桥保证公司均构成募捐诈骗罪。

14 appellants, such as Huang Jiaxuan, as senior managers or related business leaders of the Fast Deer Group, Donghongqiao Small Loan Company and Donghongqiao Guarantee Company, the actual control relationship within the Fast Deer Group and the formation and actuality of the illegal fund-raising pool The situation of control, the debts and guarantees involved in illegal fund-raising are all false, most of the fund-raising funds are not used for production and business activities, serious redemption crisis occurs during the process of illegal fund-raising, free use, and squandering funds are known. To arrange for the management of relevant units and personnel to work together to jointly implement the fund-raising fraud activities of this case, they shall be identified as the supervisors directly responsible for the fund-raising fraud activities of the Express Group, Donghongqiao Small Loan Company and Donghong Bridge Guarantee Company, or other directly responsible personnel. It constitutes a crime of fund-raising fraud. In addition to Zhou Mengmeng and Xu Qi, the remaining 12 appellants supported and cooperated in the fund-raising fraud activities of this case. The participation time was long, the amount involved was extremely large, the behavior was positive, the status and role were outstanding, and they could not be recognized as accomplices according to law.

With regard to the amount of crimes committed by each appellant, the amount of actual economic losses caused by the original judgment in participating in illegal fund-raising activities during the term of office is valid in the law and should be confirmed. In addition, some appellants or departments were arrested by the public security organs, or did not make a truthful confession of the facts of the crime after the case, and did not meet the conditions for the establishment of the surrender; individual appellants did not meet the conditions for the establishment of meritorious service, and could not be considered as having meritorious deeds. Considering the facts, nature, amount of the appellant's crimes, their respective status and roles in the case, and the penalties imposed by the plots of surrender, confession, retreat, and embezzlement all reflect the principle of adapting the crimes and punishments, and the sentencing is not improper. Therefore, the final ruling of dismissing the appeal and maintaining the original judgment was made according to law.

After the second trial of the "Quick Deer" series of cases, the judicial organs of this Municipality will continue to strengthen the recovery and damage of the assets involved, and continue to pursue and prosecute those involved in the flight.

(Look at the news Knews reporter: Wu Haiping Intern Editor: Li Yuwen)

xx